All articles
Materials

Acoustic panels that don't look acoustic

PET felt, slatted oak, and micro-perforated stone — the new vocabulary for spaces that need to be quiet without looking like a recording studio.

Acoustic panels that don't look acoustic

The brief everyone gets now

"Make it quiet, but make it look like a hotel lounge, not a podcast booth."

This brief — verbatim — landed in three of our partner studios last month. Open-plan offices, F&B venues and premium retail are all chasing NRC ≥ 0.75 without visible foam waffle.

It's worth being precise about what NRC actually measures before going further, because it gets misused constantly in spec conversations. Noise Reduction Coefficient is an average of a material's sound absorption across four frequency bands (250Hz, 500Hz, 1000Hz, 2000Hz), expressed as a number between 0 and 1. An NRC of 0.75 means the material absorbs roughly 75% of incident sound energy across that range on average — but a material can hit a high NRC while performing poorly at the low frequencies (footsteps, HVAC hum) or high frequencies (cutlery, sibilant speech) that actually bother people day to day. Ask for the full frequency-band breakdown, not just the headline NRC number, especially on hospitality projects where low-frequency ambient noise from kitchens or mechanical plant is the real complaint driver.

Three families worth knowing

1. Slatted timber on PET backing. Warm, tactile, and absorbs across the speech band. Specify rift-cut oak with a 14mm slat / 8mm gap rhythm for the cleanest read. The PET felt backing behind the slats does the actual absorption work — the timber is largely aesthetic and diffusive rather than absorptive on its own, which is a detail that catches out designers who spec timber slatting without checking what's actually mounted behind it. Cost sits in the mid-to-premium range, and lead times from UAE-based fabricators typically run three to five weeks for a standard run, longer for curved or radius applications.

2. Moulded PET felt. Comes in 80+ colours, recyclable, CNC-cuttable. Great for sculptural ceilings and back-lit reception walls. Because it's CNC-cuttable, it's become the material of choice for anything requiring a logo, pattern, or organic sculptural form cut into the acoustic surface itself — a capability none of the other two families offer as cleanly. It's also the lightest of the three, which matters on ceiling applications where structural loading is a genuine constraint.

3. Micro-perforated stone and metal. 0.5mm holes at 2mm pitch — invisible at 1m, devastating on reverb. Premium price, premium result. This is the family to specify when the brief genuinely cannot tolerate anything reading as "acoustic material" even up close — hotel lobbies with marble-heavy design languages, luxury retail where a visible acoustic product would clash with the brand. The manufacturing precision required for consistent micro-perforation at scale is why this sits at the top of the price band, typically 40–60% above moulded PET felt for an equivalent coverage area.

A fourth option, less discussed

Micro-perforated wood veneer over a mineral wool core has started showing up in briefs from studios chasing a genuinely seamless, warm-toned finish with better fire performance than PET felt alone. It's more expensive than family one and slower to source — most UAE fabricators are still building supply relationships with the specialist mills that produce it — but it's worth knowing about for projects where timeline allows.

A spec checklist

  • Always pair with a fibre backing (mineral wool or recycled PET). The face material — timber, felt, perforated stone — does very little acoustic work on its own. The backing is where absorption actually happens, and skipping it (or accepting a thin, undersized backing to save cost) is the single most common way an acoustic spec fails to perform once installed.
  • Confirm fire rating for the assembly, not just the face material. A face material with an excellent individual fire rating can still produce an assembly that fails building code once combined with adhesive, backing, and substrate. Get the fire test certificate for the specific assembly as installed, not a generic material data sheet.
  • Get install drawings from the supplier — site teams will improvise otherwise. Acoustic panel systems are more forgiving of small installation errors than, say, structural work, which paradoxically makes them more likely to be installed carelessly. A site crew without clear setting-out drawings will happily eyeball slat spacing and panel alignment, and the inconsistency shows immediately under raking light.
  • Ask about acclimatisation time before installation, particularly for timber-faced systems. Timber that hasn't acclimatised to the site's ambient humidity before fixing can warp or gap at the joints within weeks of handover — a defect that reads as a fabrication fault but is actually a sequencing fault.
  • Check panel weight per square metre against the ceiling or wall structure's rated load, especially for micro-perforated stone, which is meaningfully heavier than the other two families and occasionally gets specified without a structural sign-off.

Where each family struggles

Slatted timber shows dust and grease build-up in F&B environments faster than the other two options and needs a realistic cleaning regime specified alongside it. Moulded PET felt, while durable, can look visibly "product-like" in spaces going for a natural material language — it reads as manufactured because it is. Micro-perforated stone and metal, for all their visual discretion, are the least forgiving of on-site cutting errors; a mis-cut perforated stone panel is not something a site crew can trim to fit the way they might adjust a felt panel.

Budgeting for the right family early

The cost gap between the cheapest and most premium of these three families is wide enough that it needs to be settled at concept stage, not value-engineered later — swapping from micro-perforated stone to moulded PET felt after a design has been developed around the former's seamless, jointless look usually means reworking the whole wall or ceiling composition, not just substituting a cheaper product into the same drawing. Studios that get burned by this tend to be the ones who specified the premium option in early renders to win the pitch, without confirming the client's real budget ceiling for that category first.

Share